Search for: "US v. Mark Jacobs"
Results 1 - 20
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2006, 8:10 am
Jacob Jacoby, NYU Stern Business School: His topic was the use of dilution research in court, and its potential applications to the new federal law. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 8:47 am
Mark [sic] Jacobs International, LLC, LA CV18-10743 JAK (SKx) (C.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
A limping trade mark is a mark that is never used by itself and which gains support from the "crutch" of another, far stronger trade mark. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
Had suggested volunteering a disclaimer when a borderline mark.Robin Jacob noted that they can be useful in some circumstances and referred to the Kitchenaid case (an image of the mark is to the left). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
Local use of the mark since 1979;2. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:11 am
It ruled that the Office had failed to provide the "something more" required by Jacobs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:04 am
Jacobs J (as he then was) coined the phrase “limping trade mark” in the Philips v Remington UK case. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
Sir Robin Jacob then opened with the historical perspective on parallel rights, starting with an old case – this time the US Playing Cards case of 1902 where the Patent Office objected to registering as a trade mark a design on the back of cards because it was already a registered design. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:11 pm
Incidentally, the Jacob Zuma Foundation has filed extensively for the protection of Jacob Zuma as a trade mark in South Africa. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
Despite use of Zuma in other media, notably Zuma's Revenge, and a coffee bean supplier in Bristol these did not cause any adverse association to the mark and there is no requirement for uniqueness (Intel v CPM).Without due cause The 'defence' that the use of the sign complained of is without 'due cause' is so rarely applied that there was some scrambling around to find an appropriate authority. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
Each chapter raises questions of debate and principle including second medical use protection, scaling back the multiple functions of a trade mark and the spread of bad ideas in copyright. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:36 pm
Please do join us on 13 November to hear from Richard Vary and Sir Robin Jacob. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:12 am
The Jacobs case [Jacobs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
Merpel says, I spotted that Jacob LJ called for the repeal of the Trade Marks Act 1994, s.10(6) - but, if it has no effect, why bother? [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
" Jacobs v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm
Scott Inc. v. [read post]
